Main menu

Idaho Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 8. General Rules of Pleading.


(a) Claim for Relief. A pleading that states a claim for relief must contain:


(1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction, unless the court already has jurisdiction and the claim needs no new jurisdictional support;


(2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief; and


(3) a demand for the relief sought, which may include relief in the alternative or different types of relief.


(b) Defenses; Admissions and Denials.


(1) In General. In responding to a pleading, a party must:


(A) state in short and plain terms its defenses to each claim asserted against it; and


(B) admit or deny the allegations asserted against it by an opposing party.


(2) Denials; Responding to the Substance. A denial must fairly respond to the substance of the allegation.


(3) General and Specific Denials. A party that intends in good faith to deny all the allegations of a pleading, including the jurisdictional grounds, may do so by a general denial. A party that does not intend to deny all the allegations must either specifically deny designated allegations or generally deny all except those specifically admitted.


(4) Denying Part of an Allegation. A party that intends in good faith to deny only part of an allegation must admit the part that is true and deny the rest.


(5) Lacking Knowledge or Information. A party that lacks knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief about the truth of an allegation must so state, and the statement has the effect of a denial.


(6) Effect of Failing to Deny. An allegation, other than one relating to the amount of damages, is admitted if a responsive pleading is required and the allegation is not denied. If a responsive pleading is not required, an allegation is considered denied or avoided.


(c) Affirmative Defenses.


(1) In General. In responding to a pleading, a party must affirmatively state any avoidance or affirmative defense, including:


(A) accord and satisfaction;


(B) arbitration and award;


(C) assumption of risk;


(D) contributory or comparative responsibility;


(E) duress;


(F) estoppel;


(G) failure of consideration;


(H) fraud;


(I) illegality;


(J) injury by fellow servant;


(K) laches;


(L) license;


(M) payment;


(N) release;


(O) res judicata;


(P) statute of frauds;


(Q) statute of limitations;


(R) waiver; and


(S) discharge in bankruptcy.

 

(2) Mistaken Designation. If a party mistakenly designates a defense as a counterclaim, or a counterclaim as a defense, the court must, if justice requires, treat the pleading as though it were correctly designated, and may impose terms for doing so.


(d) Pleadings to be Concise and Direct; Alternative Statements; Inconsistency.


(1) In General. Each allegation must be simple, concise, and direct. No technical form is required.


(2) Alternative Statements of a Claim or Defense. A party may set out 2 or more statements of a claim or defense alternatively or hypothetically, either in a single count or defense or in separate ones. If a party makes alternative statements, the pleading is sufficient if any one of them is sufficient.


(3) Inconsistent Claims or Defenses. A party may state as many separate claims or defenses as it has, regardless of consistency.


(e) Construing Pleadings. Pleadings must be construed so as to do justice.

(Adopted March 1, 2016, effective July 1, 2016.)

 

As the Third Branch of Government, we provide access to justice through the timely, fair, and impartial resolution of cases.

 

Members of the
Idaho Supreme Court

Chief Justice Roger S. Burdick
Justice Joel D. Horton
Justice Robyn M. Brody
Justice G. Richard Bevan
Justice John R. Stegner



Members of the
Idaho Court of Appeals

Chief Judge David W. Gratton
Judge Sergio A. Gutierrez
Judge Molly J. Huskey
Judge Jessica M. Lorello

 

TERMS OF OFFICE


Promoting Openness In The Courts
Do you have suggestions about how we can better serve you?
CLICK HERE